<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Can you hear me?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wenger-trayner.dreamhosters.com/can-you-hear-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wenger-trayner.dreamhosters.com/can-you-hear-me/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=can-you-hear-me</link>
	<description>Social learning theorists and consultants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:49:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rita		</title>
		<link>https://wenger-trayner.dreamhosters.com/can-you-hear-me/#comment-382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wenger-trayner.dreamhosters.com/?p=9735#comment-382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What I like about online meetings is when they are over ... I explain: the only online meetings where task sharing, discussion and exposure of previously thought ideas happen, or at the moment, are those in which time is counted to the minute and, at the end, a report is sent, a minute, with what happened at the meeting. From this document, I have the memory of what happened and the possibility of reflecting and building something new for the next online meeting.
With the time that we are going through, the institutions use online to send hours of solitary work, to be the only ones to have control over the learning moment for which a distance meeting serves. They remain exactly the same, expository and &quot;owners of knowledge&quot;, but now modern, with technology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like about online meetings is when they are over &#8230; I explain: the only online meetings where task sharing, discussion and exposure of previously thought ideas happen, or at the moment, are those in which time is counted to the minute and, at the end, a report is sent, a minute, with what happened at the meeting. From this document, I have the memory of what happened and the possibility of reflecting and building something new for the next online meeting.<br />
With the time that we are going through, the institutions use online to send hours of solitary work, to be the only ones to have control over the learning moment for which a distance meeting serves. They remain exactly the same, expository and &#8220;owners of knowledge&#8221;, but now modern, with technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marco		</title>
		<link>https://wenger-trayner.dreamhosters.com/can-you-hear-me/#comment-381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wenger-trayner.dreamhosters.com/?p=9735#comment-381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are not the only one, Bev ;-) 
I like the same aspects of online participation that you have mentioned (easy connection with people far away, producing a shared &#039;boundary object&#039;, record of the meeting, sharing leadership). 
But I think that the 2D technology that we usually use online puts lots of obstacles (not only bad sound quality) on the way to a successful online interaction. 
I need 3D technology, I need space: connection with people, producing a shared text or sharing leadership becomes easier and their quality increses in a 3D environment. I hope that it will quickly become widespread and easily available, like Skype 15 years ago!

12/3/2020 19:15]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not the only one, Bev 😉<br />
I like the same aspects of online participation that you have mentioned (easy connection with people far away, producing a shared &#8216;boundary object&#8217;, record of the meeting, sharing leadership).<br />
But I think that the 2D technology that we usually use online puts lots of obstacles (not only bad sound quality) on the way to a successful online interaction.<br />
I need 3D technology, I need space: connection with people, producing a shared text or sharing leadership becomes easier and their quality increses in a 3D environment. I hope that it will quickly become widespread and easily available, like Skype 15 years ago!</p>
<p>12/3/2020 19:15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
